Screen infants at risk for developmental delay or neurological impairment. Abstract. Objective: To examine the utility of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener (BINS) as a screening technique for premature, low birth weight. Objective To determine predictive validity of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental. Screener (BINS) during the first 2 years of life with a group of children at risk.
|Published (Last):||24 February 2007|
|PDF File Size:||6.53 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.53 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Serial evaluations may reveal a pattern of change dcreener to biological risk, similar to those observed by Liaw and Brooks-Gunn in low birth weight infants. There was no need for adjustment when comparing the other five benchmark ages to the US sample since the age criteria were similar between the two groups.
The total number of items failed places the infant in a category of low, moderate, or high risk for developmental delay. The US criteria for the nonclinical sample included normal length of gestation 38 to 42 weeks and no prenatal, perinatal, or neonatal medical complications. As expected for a sample of infants without major health conditions, the BINS scores were high.
In high-risk clinics set up to follow the growth and development of low birth weight infants, infants may receive either a neurological examination or a developmental assessment; or both examinations which have overlap in items that might be administered, particularly in assessing gross and fine motor skills.
Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener. The self-reported ethnic ancestry of the child was African for Many aspects of development are affected by factors in the social environment, such as adequacy of parenting, levels of parental education, and cultural differences in child rearing practices, among others.
Although traditional cut-offs of one and two standard deviations below the mean are often utilized, we included a third category of 1. View large Download slide. In the total group of infants, some infants in each BINS risk range were receiving services from infant programs by 1 year of age.
Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener™ (BINS™) | Pearson Assessment
Search Bing for all related images. In the US, the emphasis has shifted to screening for disabilities at a younger age, birth to 2 years, with the passage of the IDEA amendments Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Infant tests are measures of present developmental status and are widely utilized as formal indicators of need for scrsener intervention services.
Full assessments such as the BSID-II Scales require 45 minutes to an hour to administer and require an advanced level of training and expertise in administration.
The study results indicate that the instrument appears to be both feasible and appropriate for neurodevelopmental screening in South America. A lower percentage of female infants from Brazil demonstrated this skill than males from Brazil or infants of either sex from the Spanish-speaking countries.
See other articles in PMC that cite the published article. Female infants performed higher than male at 16 to 20 months and 21 to 24 months; male infant scores were more variable at 5 to 6 months.
Examining the differences showed that at three months, infants in the South American sample outscored infants in the US sample, whereas at six months the relationship was reversed.
Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener™ (BINS™)
The best clinical practice may be to report scores in the moderate risk range as low-moderate risk or high-moderate risk, utilizing the cut score on the record form, and to monitor those infants obtaining high-moderate scores more frequently than those obtaining low-moderate scores. This diversity provides inference that the sample is representative of large percentages of children in the study countries.
For comparison, the US sample used in standardizing the BINS included infants across all six age groups between 3 and 24 months of age and clinical cases Aylward, Age Months 11 items. Bayley scale of inf developmtBayley scales of infant development procedureBayley scales of infant developmentbayley development infant scalebayley development infant scalesbayley scale of infant developmentBayley Scale of Infant DevelopmentBayley Scale of Infant Development IBayley Scales of Infant DevelopmentBayley scale of infant developmentBayley scale of infant development assessment scale.
Spanishnone of the comparisons yielded significant difference. A closer look at the data showed that in Spanish speaking countries, Linear interpolation was used to better approximate the distribution that would have been obtained if a sample of 2. Advances in child neuropsychology. Further studies with diagnostic assessments of these children are needed to directly evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the BINS in this population. Given the large number of tests conducted for this analysis more thanthe observed result of 3 significant tests is in line with the chosen alpha.
Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener™
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. Next, all the physicians enrolling children in this study were trained in the administration of the BINS at a group meeting in Brazil by one of the study investigators AMM.
The validity of risk assessment instruments for transition-age youth. The Thirteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook.
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. For maternal education, Assessing the utility of these instruments for use in less developed screeer is essential to enhance the capacity of health professionals to screen for developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
Search other sites for ‘Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screen’. Age Months c 13 items. Group differences were evaluated using t-tests.