At a time when the Christian church faces an ever-increasing challenge from a secular and pluralistic culture, leading apologist Norman Geisler provides a. Norman Geiser’s masterful work, Christian Apologetics, is a very thorough textbook that builds a strong epistemological foundation before even. £-V3 / Christian Apobgerics NORMAN, GEISLER UT-DAUASllBRARltS BT G43 stax .. One cannot draw l he limits of language and thought unless he has.

Author: Malagami Gusho
Country: Bhutan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 22 January 2006
Pages: 389
PDF File Size: 12.91 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.2 Mb
ISBN: 634-8-35787-990-9
Downloads: 54473
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kigahn

I Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling, pp. Descartes offers two proofs for God and apologetice are rationalistic.

Write a customer review. Indeed, human reason often hinders, if not obscures, the knowledge of God.

I am not a compulsive book buyer. Some have attempted to avoid the logic of the above critique by putting their skepticism in the form of a question: Not everything need be empirically falsifiable.

Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscripts, sec. Jesuss Apologetic Use of Reason. He and his wife live in Charlotte, North Carolina.

If one occupies himself with real theology one can pass by so called natural theology only as one chrisstian pass by an abyss into which he is to step if one does not want to fall. For example, a triangle must have three sides. By contrast with reason, it is both more sensitive and more comprehensive.

However, Leibniz’ rationalism becomes apparent as he proceeds to argue for the existence apologetids God by way of the principle of sufficient reason. And that whereof one cannot speak, he should not attempt apologetice speak thereof. Without an epistemological way of know- ing the truth, no ontological truth claims can be pressed. Hume set forth the basis of his position in the concluding les of his famous Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. It can eliminate what is false but cannot in and of itself establish what must be true.


Christian Apologetics: Norman L. Geisler: : Books

That is, they fail to distinguish the order of knowing and the order of being. This is not a book based on evidential apologetics such as Josh McDowell’s “Evidence that Demands a Verdict” but rather a philosophical approach to apologetics.

Perhaps the best way to understand rationalism is to see how it unfolded in its three major representatives in the modern world. The same events and “facts” do have different meanings within different world views. It is this faith that God himself puts into the human heart, of which the proof is often the instrument; but this faith is in the heart, and makes us not say scio [I know], but credo [I believe]” No. Without existence it would not be by nature a necessary existent.

At a time when the Christian church faces an ever-increasing challenge from a secular and pluralistic culture, leading apologist Norman Geisler provides a substantive resource for answering the challenge. He critiques the views of Kant, Hume, Ayer, and Wittgenstien.


Get to Know Us. Logic alone at best a negative test for truth. Like the ethical, the rational is not discarded by Kierkegaard but it is christia. If skepticism is true, it is false. For this internal test, Geisler presents systematic consistency as the test for truth for statements within a worldview that has first been established through the tests of unaffirmability and undeniability.

Hence, the rationalist confuses actual undeniability with rational in- escapability. Second, there is the law of contradiction or identity which affirms that something must be itself and cannot be other than itself.

Flew and Maclntyre, p. This creative synthesis solved the problem of rationalism and empiricism.

Explore Baker

Michael Wilhelm rated it it was amazing Oct 23, Agnosticism is self-destructive; reality is not paradoxical and unknowable. Many who believe in God are willing to admit that they have no direct knowledge of God but claim none- theless to have access to the existence and nature of God via his effects or the things he has made or said.

Reason plays only a negative and dialectical role in relation to faith; it enables us to understand that Christian truth is paradoxical.