A escala original consiste de 21 itens, incluindo sintomas e atitudes, cuja tais como as escalas de Hamilton (Hamilton, ) e de Zung (Zung, ), são altas os inventários de ansiedade e depressão de Beck, além da escala URICA. da escala de auto-avaliacao de ansiedade de SAS, numa amostra da the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale of Zung (SAS), applied in the pre-test and the three. Cuestionarios clínicos estandarizados de detección, tales como a Escala de Ansiedade Manifesta de Taylor ou a Escala de ansiedade Zung Self-Rating, poden.

Author: Tesar Bahn
Country: Grenada
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Spiritual
Published (Last): 2 March 2006
Pages: 165
PDF File Size: 5.69 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.25 Mb
ISBN: 416-4-36531-707-3
Downloads: 48879
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Malajas

The observed sensitivity and speciicity are acceptable, but it should be noted that not all the admitted students were cli nically diagnosed, only those who requested DBU services. The Zung Depression Dde In the table above see Table 9the psychological va riables anxiety, depression and family Apgar are compared among students aged 17 years or less, between 18 and 19 years and 20 ed more years, for which the one-factor ANOVA factor age groupswomen and men were con sidered separately.

Spearman’s linear correlation index was used to study the convergent validity and divergence between the scales and dimensions considered. A self-rating depression scale.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

To answer the research questions, the psychometric properties of the scales used were verified through a study of their internal consistency, through Cronbach’s Alpha, followed by an exploratory factor analysis. The items with an area significantly greater than 0,5 were considered appropriate.

The scale is structured into 20 affirmations with a Likert-type response scale ranging from never 1 to always 4where questions 5, 9, 13, 17 and 19 dw written in inverse sense. The scores that characterize the students in anxiety, depression and family Apgar are shown later, taking into account the results sscala the comparisons by age and sex.

It was finally constituted by 19 items with a Cronbach Alpha reliability of, 0, Family Apgar items show an excellent discrimination level with respect to the total score, with areas under the ROC curve significantly higher than 0,5, at a significance level of 0,01 See Table 4. The instrument was designed by William WK Zung inoriginally written in English and later translated into Spanish. Because each com pared group women and men escaka very large sample sizes, asymptotic normality in Student’s t-statistic was assumed, thanks to the application of anseidade Limit Central Theorem proposed by Lindeberg-Levy Mayorga Alvarez,inding the following results:.


Silvia Parcias I ; Barbie P.

British Journal of Psychiatry 5: It is suggested to continue with the validation of the measuring instruments that are being used in the UIS Entrance Examination, and then carry out the study of the risk factors associated with the dropout and low academic performance problems of the students, with the purpose of proposing early correctives that promote their permanence in the university and the success in their careers.

The questionnaires were applied as part of a comprehensive assessment of admitted students, oriented to an early diagnosis of risk factors that may influence their academic performance. And 2 to compare the anxiety, depression and family functionality dscala between students’ sex and age range, in order to optimize the chances of success in the students, ensuring that the measurements are accurate and adjusted to the characteristics of the population under study.

The scale was created by Zung inbased on affective, physiological and psychological aspects that usually characterize depression. The total-element correlation and discrimination levels of the items were adequate. A tabela 3 demonstra esses resultados. The previous results allow concluding that the mentioned tests measure characteristics coherent with their theoretical deinition within the Colombian student population.

Extreme groups with high scores above the 72nd percentile and low scores below the 28th percentile are used to compare the total test. Of these, students Recuperado el 15 de marzo dede Recuperado el 15 de marzo dede http: Df significant differences were observed between students’ age groups.


Validation of the Portuguese version of the Major Depression Inventory

Anxiety and depression are disorders that affect the individual in a negative way, and positive correlations are expected between the scores of both tests. The scale is structured into 20 affirmations with a Likert-type response scale ranging from never 1 to always 4where questions 5, 9, 13, 17 and 19 are written in inverse sense.

Consultado o 20 de febreiro de Depression, validation, questionnaires, mood disorders, inventory. Previous research has shown that depression and anxiety are factors that negatively influence the student’s integra tion into university life and, consequently, their academic performance Jaude, Anxiety levels were significantly higher in women, and no significant average variation was observed between age ranges for each gender. At first, the level of reliability and validity of the instruments used as part of the diagnostic process of the new students was verified.

Case-finding instruments for depression in primary care settings. And esdala, are the levels of anxiety, depres sion, and family functionality in newly admitted students different across age ranges? Cronbach alfa’s for the total scale was 0. Pascarella and Terenzini mentioned four factors to be taken into account in the academic success or failure of university newly admitted students: Differentiated Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies “.

Psychologia2 2 Scores are compared through the ROC Curve methodology. Consultado o 19 de maio de Manual of Psychiatric Nursing Care Planning: Although adequate factor loads are shown in the factor analysis, the Cronbach’s Alpha between the dimensions was 0, 0, 0, and 0, which indicates that the resulting dimensions do not present an adequate internal consistency, thus maintaining the unifactorial structure originally proposed without item 6.